Dan Marsh on 15 May 2002 18:05:34 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [nbo] Proposal Marsh.3

Did Marsh.3 just slip under everyone's radar?  I believe this passed, by the 
logic I used in my original scam.  Too bad I didn't add something scammy to 

>From: "Dan Marsh" <dmarsh3000@hotmail.com>
>Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:18:14 -0400
>Proposal Marsh.3:
>Amend Section 6 of Law 4 (JudicialRulings) to read as follows:
>(a) A player accepting a Nomination as Judge shall reply in not less than
>two, nor more than five, days, from his acceptance to publish a Ruling to
>all Players.
>(d) A Judicial Ruling must include an answer of True, False, or Null and 
>include any other materials the Judge believes relevant to the Ruling but
>these shall not be considered legally material.

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

[-- brought to you by notbob-official@nomic.net --]
[- http://ddickens.pepperdine.edu/nomic/ for now -]
[----- please, remember to trim the quotes -------]