[Nomic02] Pending proposals: Psmith's votes, and a revised proposal

[Carl Muckenhoupt]

On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:

> True; note that the website is not officially part of the game, however, 
> and since the two phrases are synonymous anyway I'm prepared to veto any 
> proposal that baf be demerited for lying about the rules.

In addition, I submit that this was a mistake, not a deliberate deception.  
I have corrected it.  Also, typos of this sort shouldn't occur much; I
retyped that rule because it was inconvenient at the time for me to copy
the email directly, but this will not generally be the case.