[Nomic02] [P] remove rule 158

[Adam Biltcliffe]

As I read them, the pointer-chasing rules don't allow for modifications to 
rule numbers referenced in pending proposals, only in already-enacted 
rules. The following proposals all conflicted at the time of proposal with 
what was then Rule 156:

Non-Introspective Robot [jwalrus]
Automated Automaton [Psmith]
robotfindsflyingkitten [jwalrus]
robotfindsflightcapablekitten [Psmith]

However, with the ratification of Non-Introspective Robot [jwalrus], Rule 
156 will be replaced with the almost-identical Rule 158 which would not be 
removed by the ratification of any of the other three proposals above. 
Ratifying any of those would therefore lead to the existence of two 
contradictory rules. I therefore make the following proposal:

ROBOT, IGNORE THIS COMMAND [jwalrus]

Remove Rule 158.



jw