Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:39:03 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Carl Muckenhoupt wrote:
> I'm still undecided about this. I just want to comment on this new trend
> of compound proposals, which started with the Servant's Quarters proposal.
> My opinion is that nothing in the rules forbid it; if everything in a
> proposal is allowed to be done by unanimous consent, then the proposal as
> a whole can be decided by unanimous consent.
Irrelevant nit-pick: I think it actually started with Passive Voting, so
that the rule about joining/leaving the PV list couldn't pass without the
definition of the PV list passing as well.
_/<-= Admiral Jota =->\_
\<-= firstname.lastname@example.org =->/