[Nomic02] a vague attempt at summarising

Carbol, Roger nomic02@wurb.com
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:23:23 -0700

> I'm a little displeased that we now have a rule referring to demerits,
> but not a rule stating how they're earned or whether they're=20
> part of the state of the game. =20

I like it.

I'm of the opinion that anything referenced by the rules is
implicity part of the game state.  Consider Rule 2 and its
reference to 'English', for example.

My general nomic style is to introduce small, atomic,
axiomatic-ish sorts of rules, and let them interact,
rather than trying to fully define things all in one
big rule.

> Consider this a formal proposal:  Remove Rule 11.


.. Roger

This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity =
named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally =
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a =
person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the =
intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, =
or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in =
it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in =
error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or =
delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by =
us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.