Subject: MN: this week's voting results

From: kenningd@w... (L'homme a tete de choux)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 11:33:16 +0100

Under the new system introduced last week, might I suggest that the voting
results should perhaps read more like this:

[of 11 players, 6 were active (assuming PaulWay was only made inactive *after*
votes were calculated), so quorum is 4 on all proposals this week, not 2 -- all
proposals were quorate either way, so it doesn't make much difference]

For Aga Pass Abs Votes Quo Result

453 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted [ie amends etc as above]
454 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted
455 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted
456 3 1 1 1 5 4 Accepted
457 1 3 1 1 5 4 Fails
458 2 2 1 1 5 4 Fails
459 3 1 1 1 5 4 Accepted
460 3 1 1 1 5 4 Accepted
461 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted
462 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted
463 4 0 1 1 5 4 Accepted

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
dave Dunx Grimc Jon Jthn Julie Kevn miKi Paul Slak Y_M
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

453 (Kevan) FOR FOR - - - FOR PAS FOR ABS - -
454 (Kevan) FOR FOR - - - FOR PAS FOR ABS - -
455 (Kevan) FOR FOR - - - FOR PAS FOR ABS - -
456 (miKi) FOR FOR - - - AGA FOR PAS ABS - -
457 (miKi) AGA AGA - - - FOR AGA PAS ABS - -
458 (dave) PAS AGA - - - FOR AGA FOR ABS - -
459 (dave) PAS FOR - - - FOR AGA FOR ABS - -
460 (dave) PAS FOR - - - FOR AGA FOR ABS - -
461 (Dunx) FOR PAS - - - FOR FOR FOR ABS - -
462 (Dunx) FOR PAS - - - FOR FOR FOR ABS - -
463 (Dunx) FOR PAS - - - FOR FOR FOR ABS - -

It doesn't affect the results one bit, but I'm assuming here everyone
*actively* voted Pass on eir own proposals, which is what is evident from the
results -- otherwise, they should be counted as abstentions, which would mean
eir proposals only just made quorum...

dave