Subject: Re: [MacroNomic] Votes

From: "Brian Campbell" <[email-masked]>
Date: 21 Aug 98 17:43:38 -0400

>163 LOYAL
>164 FOR
>165 LOYAL
>166 AGAINST
>(I can see the difficulties inherent in actually getting appointments done
>on this system, especially with players having to leave their post and
>organise a replacement.  I think that preventing Active Secretaryships for
>such a type of secretary is a bit risky.)
>167 FOR
>168 LOYAL

What about 169-174?

--- Brian Campbell (AKA lambda)
Visit my webpage: http://world.std.com/~campbell/Brian/
Visit the Latin Club webpage: http://world.std.com/~lambda/
Visit the MacroNomic webpage: http://world.std.com/~lambda/macronomic/

----------
Nihil sub sole novum.