Subject: acka-voting Digest V4 #123
From: [email-masked]
To: acka-voting digest users <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:00 EDT

acka-voting Digest	Monday, June 21 1999	Volume: 04  Issue: 123

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Acka: Proposal 4201 rejected
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:38:45 -0400 (EDT)

Proposal 4201

Subcommittee vote for: 0   against:-221
Subcommittee Acceptance Index: -331.5
Rejected in subcommittee
Total vote for: 354   Total vote against:-559
Acceptance Index: -484.5: proposal rejected

Votes to accept:
  /dev/joe               60    +20  ==> 2264
  Laa Laa                90    +5   ==> 212
  Blest Lax Monk Pal     60    +20  ==> 319
  else...if              60    +20  ==> 343
  ThinMan                30    +20  ==> 636
  K 2                    54    +20  ==> 489

Votes to reject:
  Dragon Mage           -80    +10  ==> 3061
  Alfvaen               -35    +20  ==> 221
  Ai! Pedrito!         -100         ==> 169
  Pure Haste             -3    +20  ==> 672
  Studge               -121    -21  ==> 579
  King Felix            -60    +20  ==> 998
  IdiotBoy             -100         ==> 292
  Slakko                -60    +20  ==> 526

Abstainers:
  Calvin N Hobbes      
  404 Not Found        
  Taser                
  Robin Hood           
  rufus                
  Vynd                 
  rice                 
  danke                
  Burn the Witch       
  Niccolo Flychuck     
  two-star             

 Subject: Acka: Proposal 4201
 
 Proposal 4201
 Can you say "grab for power"?
 Laa Laa
 Due: Mon Jun 21 14:04:02 1999
 Sphere: Anti-Canada Kamikaze Alliance
 Status: rejected

 In rule 2 replace:
 
 "As soon as possible after a proposal's prescribed voting period ends,
 the votes on that proposal shall be posted publicly. If the Subcommittee
 Acceptance Index exceeds its Subcomittee Acceptance Threshold then the
 proposal is considered to have passed in subcommittee. Otherwise it is
 rejected in subcommittee. A proposal is rejected in subcommittee if its
 subcommittee is no longer a Sphere of Influence at the end of the
 proposal's voting period. If the proposal does not have a subcommittee
 than it is treated as automatically being passed in subcommittee. If the
 proposal passes in subcommittee and its Acceptance Index exceeds its
 Acceptance Threshold then it is accepted. Otherwise it is rejected."
 
 with:
 
 "As soon as possible after a proposal's prescribed voting period ends,
 the votes on that proposal shall be posted publicly. If the Subcommittee
 Acceptance Index exceeds its Subcomittee Acceptance Threshold then the
 proposal is considered to have passed in subcommittee. Otherwise it is
 rejected in subcommittee. A proposal is rejected in subcommittee if its
 subcommittee is no longer a Sphere of Influence at the end of the
 proposal's voting period. If the proposal does not have a subcommittee
 than it is treated as automatically being passed in subcommittee. If the
 proposal passes in subcommittee, its Acceptance Index exceeds its
 Acceptance Threshold and more than twenty percent of the non-zero votes
 were greater than 0, then it is accepted. Otherwise it is rejected."

------------------------------

Subject: Acka: Proposal 4219
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:38:54 -0400 (EDT)

Proposal 4219
Pragmatism (All I Have To Offer)
King Felix
Due: Mon Jun 28 15:38:53 1999
Sphere: Wombles of Wibbledon

This is Needless Furniture.

[Sometimes officers take over from other officers who have been delinquent
or have left the game taking their knowledge of the game state with them.
This rule offers an alternative to wading through the archives.]

Create rule 6-6 named "Pragamtic Harfing" with the following MANIC delimited
text:

MANIC
Any Officer responsible for tracking an aspect of the game state may make a
public report known as a Pragmatic Report detailing the status of that
aspect as e believes it to exist. This report becomes a true representation
of the game state if it goes uncorrected for two weeks.

For a correction to be valid it must offer the correct information in place
of what was presented by the officer. [i.e. No player may simply say "That's
not right", they have to offer a valid alternative.]

It is a privilidge of the President and the Speaker to publicly invalidate a
Pragmatic Report without the need for replacement information.
MANIC

Amend rule 6-20-1 ("SHF") by replacing the first occurence of the string
"OD" with the string "public action". And replace the string "OD is
overturned" with the string "public action is objected to by more than two
players".

------------------------------

Subject: Acka: Proposal 4203 accepted
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:49:29 -0400 (EDT)

Proposal 4203

Subcommittee vote for: 120   against:0
Subcommittee Acceptance Index: 120.0
Passed subcommittee
Total vote for: 524   Total vote against:-334
Acceptance Index: 23.0: proposal accepted

Votes to accept:
  /dev/joe                1    +20  ==> 2284
  Laa Laa                60    +20  ==> 232
  else...if              60    +20  ==> 363
  Alfvaen                98    +1   ==> 222
  Ai! Pedrito!           60    +20  ==> 189
  Pure Haste             75    +12  ==> 684
  Studge                 60    +20  ==> 599
  ThinMan                10    +20  ==> 656
  King Felix            100         ==> 998

Votes to reject:
  Blest Lax Monk Pal   -100         ==> 319
  Dragon Mage           -80    +10  ==> 3071
  IdiotBoy             -100         ==> 292
  K 2                   -54    +20  ==> 509

Abstainers:
  Calvin N Hobbes      
  404 Not Found        
  Taser                
  Robin Hood           
  rufus                
  Vynd                 
  rice                 
  danke                
  Burn the Witch       
  Slakko               
  Niccolo Flychuck     
  two-star             

 Subject: Acka: Proposal 4203
 
 Proposal 4203
 Speaker Hearing
 Ai! Pedrito!
 Due: Mon Jun 21 20:33:18 1999
 Sphere: Anti-Canada Kamikaze Alliance
 Status: accepted

 {{[Let's get this settled once and for all]}}
 
 When this proposal passes, a Hearing is called.  Count Tabula is Hearing
 Harfer.  The appropriate responses are 
 1) "El Presidente?  E's just a puppet head!"
 and 
 2) "It's Good to be the King"
 
 This is a Serious Hearing
 
 If the result of the hearing is "El Presidente?  E's just a puppet head!",
 then amend rule 6-4-1 ("Speaker") section (i) to read in full: "The office
 of Speaker is a political office with one seat."
 
 If the result of the hearing is "It's Good to be the King", then amend rule
 6-4-1 ("Speaker") section (i) to read in full: "The office of Speaker is a
 functional office with one seat."

------------------------------

End of acka-voting Digest V4 #123
*********************************