Subject: acka-voting-digest V3 #191
From: [email-masked] (acka-voting-digest)
To: [email-masked]

acka-voting-digest     Thursday, November 5 1998     Volume 03 : Number 191

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 03:25:13 -0500 (EST)
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Acka: Proposal 3715 rejected

Proposal 3715

Votes: 11/20 (7 YES votes): Quorum not met

Yes:
  r-attila the farce   (Giant Objectionable Potato)
  Wallace              
  /dev/joe             (Vulcan)
  **** Bonus Vote (Alfvaen) ****
  Rex Mundi            (Klingon)
  Robin Hood           (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party)
  Studge               (Giant Objectionable Potato)
  JT                   (The Razor Boomerangs)

No:
  Alfvaen              (MetaMorph)
  A Mean Hat.          (Giant Objectionable Potato)
  Slakko               (SPAM)
  Gromit               (The Razor Boomerangs)

Abstain
  IdiotBoy             (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party)
  K 2                  
  Calvin N Hobbes      (HARF)
  Vynd                 
  rufus                (SPAM)
  ThinMan              (Vulcan)
  eirs                 (Klingon)
  Wild Card            (SPAM)
  two-star             

Vacationing & did not vote:
  AJ                   
  Rig R. Mortis        
  J. M. Bear           (MetaMorph)
  saaremaa             (Vulcan)

>Subject: Acka: Proposal 3715
>
>Proposal 3715
>Repairing a Frobnotz
>JT
>Due: Wed Nov  4 22:31:58 1998
>
>This is a modest proposal.
>{{[
>   On September 30, 1998, K 2 changed rule 1201, so that Tammany voted
>   YES on a hearing.   This just fixed that rule.  The other pole of the
>   Frobnotzer didn't change the semantic meaning of the rule, so I
>   don't see any need to bother with that one.
>]}}
>
>Amend rule 1201 (The Illustrious DoppelSlakko) by replacing the following
>sentance as delimited by FROB
>FROB
>An infinitesimal amount of time before that, Tammany will vote YES on a
>Hearing.
>FROB
>with the following sentance as delimited by NOTZER
>NOTZER
>An infinitesimal amount of time before that, Tammany will vote NO on this
>proposal.
>NOTZER

------------------------------

End of acka-voting-digest V3 #191
*********************************