Subject: acka-research-digest V2 #188
From: [email-masked] (acka-research-digest)
To: [email-masked]

acka-research-digest     Tuesday, December 2 1997     Volume 02 : Number 188

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:16:55 +0000 ()
From: Duncan Richer <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 2399 rejected

On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Brian Raiter wrote:

> 15/18 votes: Quorum achieved
> 6/14 YES votes: Proposal rejected
> 
>     NO:
> ThinMan             (Vulcan)
> Malenkai            (Vulcan)
> /dev/joe            (Vulcan)
> mr cwm              (SPAM)
> breadbox
> Balsamic Dragon     (SPAM)
> two-star            (MetaMorph)
> Tammany                                 [Malenkai bribed Tammany A$5]
Ironic, huh?  Not that it mattered.

- --
Duncan "" Richer aka
Duncan C. Richer - aka Slakko the Lost Warner Brother - Now Really Lost!
Queens' College -- PhD, Pure Maths, Graph Theory -- Cambridge University

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 08:58:47 -0500
From: "Bollinger, John C." <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: Acka: Proposal 2431

Slakko wrote:

> Do the rules anywhere state that Proposals are Entities?
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
**BUZZZZZZ**  Wrong Answer!

> Or that rulse themselves are entitites?
> 
Check rule 500.  It explicitly states that rules and proposals are
unownable entities.

ThinMan

------------------------------

End of acka-research-digest V2 #188
***********************************