The player who submits a CFJ is Disqualified with respect to that CFJ, as is any player who has previously served as a Judge for that CFJ and who failed to return a judgement on that CFJ in accordance with the rules, and any player On Hold.
One may wonder why I have suggested 386 and 396 be amended separately. The reason is that I think 386 should be reserved for things that would make a player 'intrinsically' Disqualified, whereas 396 would be the place for inserting ways of disqualifying players based on the particular actions. On Hold status is kind of in the gray area, but I ended up deciding to put it here.
distributed Tue 28 Jun PDT
Jim FOR Bill FOR