Subject: Simplex: Proposition Submission
From: Jeffrey Reinecke <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 15:28:08
Harry the Handsome Executive
Repair my proposition so that hte SWING delimited text reads:
To be eligible for the position of Judge, you must satisfy the following
(1) You must be a citizen.
(2) You may not be the plaintiff (defined to be the person who filed the
request for judgment)
(3) You may not be the defendant (defined to be a single, specific
person, who the request for judgment is against).
(4) In the event of an appeals trial, you may have never been Judge on
this case before.
In the event that no one remains eligible for the position of Judge, the
requirement with the highest ordinal number will be removed, and again a
Judge will be selected. This process of removing the highest numbered
requirement may be recursively completed as many times as necessary in
order to have an eligible Judge. Note that up to one, and no more than
one defendant may be named on any single request for judgment. This
implies that if you want to file a request for judgment against multiple
citizens, you must do so via multiple requests for judgment.
On any case, an appeal, and only one appeal may be filed. No case may be
re-tried outside of the appeals process. If, after a verdict is made on
the original case, any citizen is unsatisfied with the verdict, an appeal
may be filed via a request for judgment. In the event of an appeal, a
second Judge, who must satisfy the previous eligibility requirements, has
two choices: (1) rule in favour of the original verdict, in which case the
original verdict stands as final, or (2) rule in opposition and make an
alternate verdict. In this case, a third Judge, who satisfies the
previous eligibility requirements, will rule the final verdict to be one
of the two previous Judge's verdicts. The third Judge may not create his
own verdict. Whichever the third Judge chooses, is the final verdict, and
may not be appealed.