Subject: FW: Simplex: RFJ2: The Harfy Parrot.
From: Jeffrey Reinecke <>
Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 17:20:18

>From: Mueller <>
>To: "Jeffrey Reinecke" <>
>Subject: Simplex: RFJ2: The Harfy Parrot.
>Date: Sat, Sep 12, 1998, 18:06

>Please submit the following PARROT delimited text to the citizens of
>Simplex by email.
>The thingie with the name Olaf Ragnorak the harfy rabid parrot states in
>its description:
>>Olaf Ragnorak the harfy rabid parrot pecks out the eyes of
>>any player who disagrees with Tom or with Muscle Man Murphy.
>>No players can own Olaf except for Gabe, known in Simplex as
>>Mr. Harf. No players, including Gabe and including Dictator
>>Tom to be, can alter or remove Olaf in any way. This takes
>>precedence over any rule, law, proposal, act of Tom, or any
>>other thing in the future that would do so, including things
>>that say that they take precedence over this.
>The applicable law in this case is Law 115 which states:
>>Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a law is
>>permitted and unregulated, with the sole exception of
>>changing the laws, which is permitted only when a law or
>>set of laws explicitly or implicitly permits it.
>The parrot was created under the authority of 115 which defers all actions
>it permits to any other law. Therefore, though the parrot claims
>precedence over laws to be, it is not authorized to do so.
>The issue I'd like clarified by a judge is: Can Olaf Ragnorak the harfy
>rabid parrot be affected by Laws created in the future as I claim or not?
>If not why?

If you want to make a judgment, you are going to need to do so via the
proper RFJ procedures.