RE: [nbo] AMENDED Proposal Togas.1

["Dickens, David" <David.Dickens@pepperdine.edu>]

I believe I must rule on this Tom.  A ruling of Null would be appropriate
since this matter is no longer in question.

Put simply, since the players solved the dispute between themselves there is
nothing to adjudicate. I must rule Null. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Ogas [mailto:tom_ogas@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:02 PM
To: notbob-official@nomic.net
Subject: Re: [nbo] AMENDED Proposal Togas.1


I submit.  There is no dispute.  I agree that a player shouldn't be allowed
to change the proposed rule once submitted, I just wish I'd proofed my
proposal before cutting and pasting it in.  

There is no need to do a JR unless Mr. Dickens REALLY wants to (and he
probably does, because he gets points).

> I therefore call for a Judicial Review.  I ask David Dickens to judge 
> the
> veracity of the following statement:
> 
> ---
> Once a player has published a proposal according to the rules, he may 
> not
> modify the proposal except as provided by law.
> ---
> 
> I should say that my preferred method for handling a poorly-written 
> proposal
> (if such it be) is to vote AGAINST it.

--Tom

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com

[-- brought to you by notbob-official@nomic.net --]
[- http://ddickens.pepperdine.edu/nomic/ for now -]
[----- please, remember to trim the quotes -------]

[-- brought to you by notbob-official@nomic.net --]
[- http://ddickens.pepperdine.edu/nomic/ for now -]
[----- please, remember to trim the quotes -------]