--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              MORNINGTON NOMIC

                   Proposals for Voting on in Week Eleven
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 099 - Paragraph Shunting [Other, Multiple]

[Amendment: Non-Conservation of Momentum]

Append the following paragraph to Rule 1018 (Shunting):-

"If a Player Shunts another Player, then the Line Velocity of both Players
becomes zero (0)."

[Repeal: Tidying Up]

Repeal Rule 1037 (Non-conservation of Momentum).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 100 - Direct Tinkering Ban [Enactment]

If the passing of a Proposal would directly cause any aspect of the
Mornington Crescent Game State (such as Token levels, Piece positions
or Station Blocks) to be altered, that Proposal may not pass,
irrespective of Votes cast. This takes precedence over all other
Rules regarding the passing of Proposals.

{
  Comments:

  Complicated little "Vote FOR this and you'll get a Red Token, AGAINST
  and you'll lose a Black, unless it's Thursday, in which case you gain
  a Blue, and boys whose older brothers *aren't* having their hair cut
  should put their bags on the *lower* pegs." proposals are all very
  fine and entertaining and lovely, but they shouldn't really be
  messing around with the Game State, I feel. There's no point having
  Rules to establish proper Token collection if people can just say
  "Hey, let's all have ten Blue Tokens!" when they feel like it.
}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 101 - Monster Raving Loony Payola [Enactment]

A Player may Play an Action of RANT if e Plays a Move of PASS whilst at
Hyde Park Corner and has less than one (1) Kudos point.

Any player who RANTs for two consecutive Turns has all of eir non-Gold
Tokens converted to Gold Tokens at a ratio of 1 non-Gold Token to 1 Gold
Token.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 102 - Independant British Cinema Payola [Enactment]

Once per game, each Player may receive one (1) Gold Token from the British
Filmmaker's Association. In order to do so, e must first see a film an
Independantly made British Film at the Everyman Cinema and then e must
eventually move to Ealing Common.

An Independantly made British Film is a film produced by a British Film
studio for cinematic release.

{ Comment :
     So for example, Whiskey Ahoy! is an Independantly made British Film,
but Magical Myster Tour is not (it was produced as a BBC2 special.)
     Seeing a film at the Everyman Cinema is defined in another rule.
}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 103 - A Quick Game of Prisoner's Dilemma [Enactment]

All Players who Voted either FOR or AGAINST this Rule will receive a
reward.

If this Rule received no Votes AGAINST, then all Players receive one (1)
Gold Token.

Otherwise, all Players who vote FOR this Rule will receive one (1) red
token and all Players who vote AGAINST this Rule will receive a quantity of
Gold Tokens equal in number to the number of Players who voted FOR this
rule.

The Speaker should indicate the appropriate rewards when e publishes the
Voting Results.

This Rule then Repeals itself.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 104 - No Bonuses Allowed [Amendment]

Amend rule 1022 by adding the following paragraph:

A Player cannot gain any advantage by using this Rule. E cannot gain 
Tokens, Ticket Stubs, or any other item specified in the rules that e 
may later use to eir benefit. When a Player uses this Rule eir Line 
Velocity becomes zero.

{comments: Finding (to my disgust) that Jims last move was legal (unless 
anyone can find a reason to BZZZT it?) I have set about to remedy the 
situation, so it may not occur again. I suspect this rule was meant as a 
last resort, not a power hungry grab for tokens. Congratulations for 
seeing the possibility Jim, but I don't want it to happen again.}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 105 - On the Rebound [Enactment]

If a Player attempts to Move along a Line Segment that contains a
Blocked Station, that Player will Rebound off the Station and return
the way e came to the extent of eir Line Velocity. The Blocked Station
will not be counted as a Station when calculating Line Velocity, but
the previous Station will be counted twice.

For example, if a player has a Line Velocity of 5 and tries to go from
Turnpike Lane to Oakwood but Bounds Green is blocked, e will end up at
Finsbury Park.

The Rebound must be stated in the Action section of the Game State
Document in accordence will rule 1001, and shall take the following
form:

        [Rebounding off <Blocked Station>]

This Rule takes precedence over Rule 1016 in that the player changes
Line direction during a Move portion.

{comments: I tried to propose this way back in week 5, but Kevan didn't 
get it. Here it is again...}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------