[Nomic02] many votes
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:44:57 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:
> > Since the general tenor of opinion seems to be tree-hugging
> > monkey protectionism rather than using them as suicide bombers, I
> > vote nay on this proposal.
> Aww. I'm all in favour of monkey bombing runs, I just saw the monkey as
> more of a sapper than a suicide bomber. In response to Jota's suggestion, I
> wouldn't really mind no lower limit, I just don't want to see a bomb
> removed from the game by someone setting its timer for three million years
> or somesuch.
I suggested the lower limit mainly because a relative upper limit (e.g.
"two times the last setting") could pose a problem if the thing it's
relative to was really small ("I set the delay to thirty seconds.").
_/<-= Admiral Jota =->\_
\<-= firstname.lastname@example.org =->/