[Nomic02] [P] Er, That's What I Meant [Jota]
Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:46:10 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:
> > A proposal in five parts. The second part is for a new rule; the
> > other four are for various changes to the game state.
> > Er, That's What I Meant [Jota]
> If they're synonymous, does that entitle baf or anyone else maintaining
> public versions of the rules to use the 'correct' spellings in those?
I wouldn't call doing so an intentional deception, if that's what you
_/<-= Admiral Jota =->\_
\<-= firstname.lastname@example.org =->/