[Nomic02] slowing down

Admiral Jota nomic02@wurb.com
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:55:16 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:

> Given the apparently overwhelming success of the voluntary slowdown, I'm of
> the opinion that a restriction on the number of proposals a player may have
> under consideration at once is no longer necessary and would only likely
> serve to cause problems if a proposal had to be made urgently in order to
> fix some flaw in the game. Therefore I vote nay on both "Slow Down [Carl
> Muckenhoupt]" and "Slow Up [Jota]". I'm not necessarily unwilling to be
> convinced to change this.

I'll mark Down dead since out of the two I prefer Up, but since I'm under
no formal limit on proposals I can have open, I'll let Up live for the
time being.

                                     _/<-=    Admiral Jota    =->\_
                                      \<-= jota@shelltown.com =->/