[Nomic02] Connectivity approved
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:00:49 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Carl Muckenhoupt wrote:
> But I have to admit that we did approve it specifically as a non-rule, and
> I don't think there's anything technically illegitimate about it. We
> passed a rule stating that we can change the map in any way we agree to,
> and so we can change the map by adding automatic behaviors to it.
Ps doubts its legitimacy, but he's proposing a rule that should remove
doubt of its validity. Until his proposal passes, the Connectivity
proposal is of uncertain validity.
> I will note that, since it isn't a rule, I don't feel obliged to put the
> exact phrasing of the proposal on my website. Rules are specifically
> sequences of sentences; change the sentence and you cange the rule. This
> is just a concept, which I can restate in my own words.
No complaint there. Rephrasing this concept to express the same
information isn't willfull deceit to me.
_/<-= Admiral Jota =->\_
\<-= email@example.com =->/