[Nomic02] two revised proposals

[Adam Biltcliffe]

>> "A specified subset of players may be deemed to have reached unanimous
>> consent on an issue in the same manner as specified in Rule 10, except
>> that only players in the specified subset are counted for determining the
>> outcome of the proposal."

Since Jota has vetoed this proposal, I hereby declare it dead, and submit 
the following proposal instead:

"A specified subset of players may be deemed to have reached 'sectional 
consent' on an issue in the same manner as specified in Rule 10, except 
that only players in the specified subset are counted for determining the 
outcome of the proposal."

>> "Any player who is found to have intentionally deceived another player
>> about the current state of the game may be issued a demerit by unanimous
>> consent of the other players."

I declare this vetoed proposal dead as well, and replace it with:

"Any player who is agreed by sectional consent of all other players to have 
intentionally deceived another player about the current state of the game 
shall receive a demerit."



jw