'cause e posted the following on 20th February 1998 15:33:56
> The Exquisite Dead Guy shall be found by the last player to post a message > containing the word "Hubert" to a public forum. Last as in most recent, or last as in never again shall any player post a message containing "Hubert" to a public forum?
'cause e posted the following on 20th February 1998 15:34:34
> The Exquisite Dead Guy shall be found by the last player to post a message > containing the word "Hubert" to a public forum. Last as in most recent, or last as in never again shall any player post a message containing "Hubert" to a public forum? -rico
'cause e posted the following on 20th February 1998 15:39:13
> am revealing the following portion of the Map: > The Exquisite Dead Guy shall be found by the last player to post a message > containing the word "Hubert" to a public forum. I should note that that really means "after this treasure is buried". Also, I am counting quoted text(but not documents required to be posted by Officers), so I just disqualified myself. :-)
'cause e posted the following on 26th February 1998 14:35:57
Results of Proposal 2724
<snip>
YES:
<snip>
Hubert (Boomerangs)
'cause e posted the following on 2nd March 1998 04:41:00
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Hubert wrote:
'cause e posted the following on 2nd March 1998 18:15:10
I don't see what the problem is here. So long as any officers, players or whatever are unambiguous they aren't doing anything wrong. Incidentally Niccolo said Hubert during the proceeds of the auction.
'cause e posted the following on 02 Mar 1998 20:26:31
If I changed my name to, say, H'bert, would ambiguous spellings of Hubert be considered possibly referring to me, even though I'm just an observer? Sunflare
'cause e posted the following on 3rd March 1998 18:50:49
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Hubert wrote:
'cause e posted the following on 8th March 1998 04:09:47
> > > For the next trick, I lead the Ten of Hearts. > > > > > -Hubert > > > > Ace of Hearts. > > Jack of Hearts. 3 of hearts
'cause e posted the following on 10th March 1998 20:02:18
> duck down: parts of a duck used in blankets And Slakko misses his opportunity to say Hubert Feathers.
'cause e posted the following on 13th March 1998 20:02:42
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Hubert wrote: > This guess is discounted because I did not receive it privately as was > specified in the map. I thwap TGW soundly. Thwapping is not regulated by > the Rules, so this happens. It is game custom that all messages sent publically are also sent privately to all subscribed to the list. GF
'cause e posted the following on 15th March 1998 13:27:58
>On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Hubert wrote:
'cause e posted the following on 15th March 1998 14:40:23
> I sneer at Hubert. Sneering _is_ regulated by the Rules, but falls under > the category of entity manipulation that has no meaningful effect on the > game state, so this happens. :) > > GF I am calling a Politeness Moon on Guy Fawkes. This is regulated and permissible, so it happens.
'cause e posted the following on 22nd March 1998 18:47:34
Tom Walmsley wrote: > > Hubert and Slakko have both linked with "dead" and so both gain one point > putting the scores to: > > Slakko: 9 > /dev/joe: 8 > Hubert: 11 I assume that /dev/joe's intended link was Arizona; am I right? (I am also assuming that commenting at this point does not constitute interference.) **two-star
'cause e posted the following on 26th March 1998 19:27:03
> Here's an idea, which is certainly NOT routine maintenance, that I like. > 1) Get the Little Lamb out of the game. The only effect of including it > is to give the winner of a weekly Hubert a great advantage.
'cause e posted the following on 31st March 1998 16:36:06
> -Hubert > > The truth is out there? Anyone know the URL? easy one. http://www.the-truth.com/text.html hoover 2300
'cause e posted the following on 7th April 1998 18:07:06
I'd just like to say, "Hubert"
'cause e posted the following on 8th April 1998 5:47:00
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Tom Walmsley wrote: > > > > The Good Ballot Stuffer I was building is now completed, and now I get to > > > auction _that_. I'll set the starting bid at A$10. > > > > I suppose I may as well make the first bid: A$10. > > And I the second, at A$11. > > -Hubert Third bid: A$14 -Joe Java
'cause e posted the following on 10 Apr 1998 19:47:34
As the most senior Priest of the cult, I welcome Hubert. One more and the Cult will once again be a Church.
CnH
'cause e posted the following on 13th April 1998 13:43:41
Aren't Evil Ballot Stuffers grrrreat?
JT should have had it anyway, from a practical point of view. He has more experience.
Koxvolio
>JT:
>Hubert
'cause e posted the following on 13th April 1998 16:53:17
Agreed. That's one point for Hubert.
'cause e posted the following on 14th April 1998 18:50:41
The players in order are
Hubert (yes, I give up on the Hubert treasure, okay :)
'cause e posted the following on 14th April 1998 22:14:29
At 10:04 PM 4/14/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>No fair! Huberted out of getting to play Eleusis because I couldn't
>check my email this morning!
'cause e posted the following on 16th April 1998 11:46:56
>Hubert voted BAA! and IdiotBoy, Guy Fawkes, ThinMan, Vynd (+EBS) and /dev/joe
>all attempted to vote for /dev/joe.
How can this august collection of personages all be wrong? Clearly the rules are incorrect about /dev/joe's elligibility, and if not, they should be! :-)
ThinMan
'cause e posted the following on 17th April 1998 21:00:47
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Hubert wrote:
'cause e posted the following on 21st April 1998 09:05:18
Erm, Hubert.
Pandora
'cause e posted the following on 21st April 1998 13:54:44
While you guys can't decide whether we must accept Hubert's suggestion as a public action or not, I publicly declare that I do accept his suggestion of creating a Secret Lab.
Ayla
'cause e posted the following on 23rd April 1998 15:51:12
> Call For Criminal Judgment 163 (April 23)
> Subject: Exhibitionism 3
> Initiator: K 2 (sent April 22, 1998, 22:57)
> Judge: Joe Java (selected April 23, 1998, 12:52)
> Judgement: TRUE
>
> Statement:
> Hubert committed the Crime of Rampant Exhibitionism on 22nd April 1998.
'cause e posted the following on 3rd May 1998 20:31:33
I am calling a Bracket Pedantry Hearing against Hubert (damn!) for the above quoted message.
I am the Grand High Pedant in Chief for this hearing. Reply to vote.
The valid responses:
"It seemed perfectly correct to me"
"It was obviously in violation!".
Rex Mundi.
'cause e posted the following on 20th May 1998 11:13:28
OK, I replied. What next?
-----Original Message----- From: Joseph W. DeVincentis <devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu> To: roie_m@pcpostal.com <roie_m@pcpostal.com>; aaron.keesler@adtran.com <aaron.keesler@adtran.com>; gmd@earthling.net <gmd@earthling.net>; jcbadger@siu.edu <jcbadger@siu.edu>; ricogames1@usa.net <ricogames1@usa.net>; glug@total.net <glug@total.net>; jerome@bccks.com <jerome@bccks.com>; stefansa@ssd.comm.mot.com <stefansa@ssd.comm.mot.com> Date: יום שלישי 19 מאי 1998 22:38 Subject: Acka: Viruses >Play Viruses! I am starting a game in about a week. >Don't get Huberted out of a chance to play! >Reply if you want to play. > >/dev/joe >
saaremaa is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 21st May 1998 18:39:26
K2: > >From the second onwards of the above > I offer as gift, to the entities: > ThinMan, saaremaa, Alfvaen with love > to Hubert and rufus if they please
I accept, although don't ask *what* I just accepted :-)
saaremaa
Fortunato is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 4th June 1998 12:10:48
Speaking of, do I not qualify as a seriously active player? And I do believe I am still eligible :)
Hubert sez:
Piz is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 17th August 1998 10:41:21
I decline to judge this case.
Piz
----------
:Piz has been selected.
:
:CFCJ 173
:Subject: Hubert's Branch Stacking
Weishaupt is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 31st August 1998 01:41:31
Hubert
Ethelred is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 2nd September 1998 07:08:08
I refuse to say "Hubert".
/dev/joe is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 3rd September 1998 21:59:44
ruufs said:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Kelly Hubert Kelly wrote:
Studge is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 26th November 1998 23:01:52
>> -Hubert, once Slagothor, Hubert, 867-5309, Tom Walmsley (was SO), Small
>> Mew Toy, The Green Ripper, once again Hubert, and now MTM.
O Olde Alpha is disqualified
'cause e posted the following on 7th Feburary 1998 08:46:05
>-Hubert