acka-voting Digest Sunday, December 06 1998 Volume 03 : Issue 219 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3870 Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 17:05:25 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3870 Subject Hearing JT Due: Sun Dec 13 17:05:24 1998 Create a rule numbered 361 with the title What's the Will of the People and the following text as delimited by WILL_O_THE_FOLK WILL_O_THE_FOLK Any player may call a hearing on a matter to be decided as a Will of the People, and will be the Hearing Harfer for that Hearing. The Hearing Harfer for a Will of the People hearing may be referred to as WillWho? for the duration of the Hearing. A Will of the People Hearing is an Extremely Silly Affair. It is also a Serious Matter [just to prevent EBSs from skewing the results]. The valid responses to a Will of the People Hearing are "Hey Man, I'm an Induhvidual" and "I cannot wait to catch up to the Jones'". If the result is the former (Induhvidual), the matter about which the hearing is being called is considered to not be the will of the people. If the result is the latter (Jones'), then the will of the people has spoken. This type of hearing should be used to gauge public opinion on a given topic. WILL_O_THE_FOLK {{ A Will of the People Hearing is called with JT as the WillWho? on the matter of should the mailing list software automatically add 'Acka:' to the subject lines for the Ackanomic mailing lists. }} ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3871 Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 17:55:50 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3871 The Next Big Thing else...if Due: Sun Dec 13 17:55:49 1998 This is a grandiose proposal Amend rule 303 to read as delimited by HEIRARCHICALSYSTEM HEIRARCHICALSYSTEM I. All rules have an H number. All references to rule numbers are to H numbers unless otherwise specified; this is a Class 1 sentence. Some rules may also have an L number, this is a Class 1 sentence. {{All rules receive an L number equal to their rule number before the proposal which most recently modified this rule passed.}} An H number consists of a string of positive integers separated by hyphens, optionally preceded by an H. Each integer in that string is known as a locator. A rule number is an H number if is preceded by H; this is a Class 1 sentence. A rule number is an L number if is is preceded by L; this is a Class 1 sentence. A rule number is an L number if the number is preceded by neither; this is a Class 1 sentence. The following relations are defined between rules: (Z means an indeterminate set of locators separated by hyphens, X means a single locator. Zn, where n is an integer, is another indeterminate set of locators, Xn is another single locator.) Rule 1 Rule 2 Rule 1 is a ____ of Rule 2 HZ HZ-X Parent HZ-X HZ Child HZ1 HZ1-Z2 Ancestor HZ1-Z2 HZ1 Descendant HZ-X1 HZ-X2 Sibling An H number is larger than another H number if the first (from left to right) integer which differs between the two is larger. When a rule Z1 is moved to become rule Z2, all its children Z1-X are moved to Z2-X II. When a new rule is created it is numbered as follows: 1. If the creator (be it proposal, rule, or something else) assigned it a valid H number not already assigned to a rule than it receives that number. 2. Otherwise, if the creator assigned it a valid H number and there is a parent (hereafter called THEPARENT to the rule with that H number than the rule receives the smallest H number, not already assigned to a rule, which would leave it as a child of THEPARENT. 3. Otherwise, it is given the smallest H number which would make a child of the Unassigned Rule Section. One week after the proposal which defined H numbers passed, replace all L numbers in the rules with the H number of that rule, and remove all Class 1 sentences from this rule; this is a Class 1 sentence. HEIRARCHICALSYSTEM Repeal rule 311 Create rule 99, "Unassigned Rule Section" with the following EXTRAPOWER delimited text EXTRAPOWER The rule-harfer may renumber descendants of this rule as a public action. EXTRAPOWER This LIST-delimited list contains numbers in the form X:Y. For each item, give rule LX the number HY. If X is the head of a rule suite, assign all children, LX.N of that suite to rule HY-N. {{[I've done my best, but some of these rules will have to be shifted, in particular 13-n rules, which were ones I got stuck on.]}} LIST 42: 42 101: 1 102: 4 104: 3 106: 3-1 107: 3-2 110: 1-1 205: 4-2 206: 7-6 207: 3-3 209: 3-4 210: 3-5 211: 5 212: 5-1 213: 5-2 214: 5-3 215: 5-4 217: 5-5 230: 8-4-1 250: 7 251: 7-1 252: 7-2 253: 7-2-1 254: 7-3 257: 7-4 301: 1-4-1 303: 1-6 309: 3-6 313: 3-1-1 315: 3-1-2 317: 3-1-3 319: 3-1-4 320: 1-5 330: 3-7 340: 1-2 342: 8-2-14-1 343: 8-2-14-2 346: 1-3 348: 1-4 360: 13-1 362: 1-6 370: 7-5 371: 4-2 373: 7-7 374: 7-5-2 380: 1-7 399: 13-2 401: 8 402: 8-1 403: 8-2 404: 8-3 405: 8-4 406: 8-2-1 407: 8-2-2 408: 8-2-3 409: 8-2-4 410: 8-2-5 412: 8-2-6 413: 8-2-7 414: 8-5 415: 8-5-1 416: 8-6 418: 8-6-1 419: 8-7 420: 8-2-8 422: 8-2-9 423: 8-2-10 424: 8-8 427: 8-2-11 428: 8-2-12 429: 8-2-13 430: 8-2-14 431: 8-9 432: 8-10 433: 8-2-15 435: 8-2-16 440: 8-2-17 441: 8-2-18 451: 8-2-2-1-1 500: 9 501: 9-1 503: 9-1-1 505: 9-2 506: 9-3 507: 9-3-1 508: 9-4 510: 9-2-1 515: 9-5 516: 9-6 520: 9-6-1 540: 9-7 541: 9-7-1 550: 9-8 560: 9-9 594: 9-10-1 595: 9-10 600: 6 601: 6-2 603: 6-3 605: 6-4 607: 6-5 611: 6-6 613: 6-7 615: 6-8 620: 6-1-1 666: 6-1 667: 6-1-2 668: 6-1-3 669: 6-1-4 670: 6-1-5 671: 6-5-1 675: 6-5-2 701: 5-5 709: 5-5-6 710: 5-5-1 711: 5-5-2 715: 5-5-3 716: 5-5-4 721: 5-5-5 750: 7-9 752: 7-9-1 755: 7-9-2 760: 7-9-3 765: 7-9-4 801: 10 810: 10-1 820: 10-2 821: 10-2-1 825: 10-2-2 837: 10-3 840: 10-4 841: 10-2-2-1 842: 10-5 843: 10-6 844: 10-7 845: 10-8 846: 10-7-1 847: 10-9 850: 10-10 851: 10-11 852: 10-12 854: 10-13 855: 10-14 856: 10-15 901: 9-11 903: 9-12 905: 3-8 907: 9-13 909: 9-14 910: 9-15 913: 13-3 915: 9-16 919: 3-7 920: 9-17 921: 9-18 923: 9-18-1 925: 7-5-3 929: 9-19 931: 9-20 933: 5-6 935: 9-20-1 940: 9-20-2 943: 9-20-3 950: 13-4 975: 9-21 1003: 11 1004: 11-1 1005: 11-2 1006: 11-3 1007: 11-4 1008: 11-5 1009: 11-6 1011: 11-5-1 1013: 11-5-2 1015: 11-5-3 1017: 11-7 1030: 11-8 1031: 11-8-1 1040: 11-9 1044: 11-10 1045: 8-2-5-1 1112: 3-9 1123: 7-5-4 1125: 9-3-2 1127: 1-4-2 1129: 7-2-2 1131: 8-2-5-2 1142: 7-8 1145: 7-5-5 1150: 13-5 1151: 13-5-1 1155: 1-8 1160: 8-2-16-1 1177: 9-20-4 1195: 13-6 1205: 12 1209: 12-1 1211: 12-2 1213: 12-3 1215: 12-4 1216: 12-4-1 1217: 12-5 1230: 11-10-1 1240: 12-6 1250: 12-7 1270: 12-8 1301: 11-11 1304: 11-11-1 1309: 10-16 1311: 10-16-1 1313: 10-17 1350: 10-18 1351: 10-19 LIST Move all descendants of rule L1390, L1390.N to H99-N. ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3872 Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 19:34:55 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3872 Merrily we fall along else...if Due: Sun Dec 13 19:34:54 1998 Create rule 555, "INTO Ambassador" with the following THISONCEWASTHELIAISON-delimited text THISONCEWASTHELIAISON The office of Ambassador is a political office. The Ambassador is the delegate^0 of Ackanomic to the InterNomic Treaty Organization^0. The Ambassador must always be subscribed to the offical INTO-mailing-list^0. Any player may call an Agreement hearing on an InterNomic-Treaty^0 which Ackanomic has not signed or a Disagreement hearing on an InterNomic-Treaty^0 which Ackanomic has signed^0 and which allows Ackanomic to unsign^0 it. The Ambassador is the Hearing Harfer on both types of hearings. The valid responses to an Agreement hearing are "No! We want to mess up things for ourselves, without help from those black-helicopter flying INTO goons!" and "Surrender control to those black-helicopter flying INTO goons!". If the result is the latter than the Ambassador should sign^0 the treaty^0 the hearing was called on for Ackanomic. The valid responses to a Disagreement hearing are "What's your problem? Our rulers are doing a great job of pretending they still have power" and "Never mind prosperity for all, let's return to the dark ages". If the result is the latter the Ambassador should unsign^0 the treaty^0. The Ambassador may never sign^0 a treaty^0 which has terms which include hyphens or carets. Should the INTO Archivist^0 be a player of Ackanomic then that player receives a monthly A$25 stipend as a salary for bringing glory to Ackanomic. If a word or string of hyphenated words is followed by a caret and then a nonnegative integer: [^n] then the word is considered to be equivalent to the way that word or that word with the hypens replaced by spaces is used in INT#n^0. No other terms or words used in the rules are considered to be the same as any terms defined in an InterNomic-Treaty^0. If n is 0 then it means the term is considered equivalent to a term defined in the INTO-rules^0. THISONCEWASTHELIAISON ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3839 accepted Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 20:00:14 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3839 Votes: 15/23 (12 YES votes): Quorum met Yes votes: 12/14: proposal accepted Yes: Trent (Giant Objectionable Potato) Euphrates Slakko (SPAM) /dev/joe (Vulcan) Jenny (The Razor Boomerangs) Vynd else...if Robin Hood (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) Studge (Giant Objectionable Potato) ThinMan (Vulcan) sIRE JT (The Razor Boomerangs) No: smallpox blanket (Klingon) MTM (The Razor Boomerangs) Baa: Alfvaen (MetaMorph) Abstain r-attila the farce (Giant Objectionable Potato) Niccolo Flychuck (MetaMorph) IdiotBoy (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) K 2 Calvin N Hobbes rufus Wild Card two-star Pending & did not vote: Danek scout Ballot Stuffer Vacationing & did not vote: Aunt Froot Ethelred J. M. Bear (MetaMorph) saaremaa (Vulcan) >Subject: Acka: Proposal 3839 > >Proposal 3839 >Fixing up a few loose ends >JT >Due: Sun Dec 6 19:36:50 1998 > >{{Destroy all existant Otzma Cards of type Felicitous Populi}} > >{{[ > 2 still exist and count against the totals I believe or maybe not since > they are no longer defined under the OC rule suite. However, let's > leave it clean, eh? >]}} > >{{ > For every Whamiol and Spell Book of Chorg a player possesses, give them > A$25 from the Treasury. > Destroy all Whamiols and Spell Books of Chorg. >}} > >{{[ > People spent good money on aquiring them, at least give them something > back. >]}} ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3840 accepted Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 20:00:25 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3840 Votes: 15/23 (9 YES votes): Quorum met Yes votes: 9/14: proposal accepted Yes: Trent (Giant Objectionable Potato) Euphrates Robin Hood (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) Slakko (SPAM) /dev/joe (Vulcan) Jenny (The Razor Boomerangs) else...if Studge (Giant Objectionable Potato) JT (The Razor Boomerangs) No: Alfvaen (MetaMorph) smallpox blanket (Klingon) Vynd ThinMan (Vulcan) MTM (The Razor Boomerangs) Baa: sIRE Abstain r-attila the farce (Giant Objectionable Potato) IdiotBoy (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) Niccolo Flychuck (MetaMorph) K 2 Calvin N Hobbes rufus Wild Card two-star Pending & did not vote: Danek scout Ballot Stuffer Vacationing & did not vote: Aunt Froot Ethelred J. M. Bear (MetaMorph) saaremaa (Vulcan) >Subject: Acka: Proposal 3840 > >Proposal 3840 >Round and round... >else...if >Due: Sun Dec 6 19:52:17 1998 > > Retitle rule 1003 "Corporations" > Amend rule 1003 to read as delimited by NEWORGORDER >NEWORGORDER >1. Forming a Corporation > >An Corporations is a named unownable entity. Any player may publically announce eir intent to form a Corporation, unless e is a pseudo-Founder. > >When a player has done so e becomes a pseudo-Founder for a period of 7-days. > >If during those 7 days at least two additional players publically announce that they wish to join the Corporation the pseudo-Founder intends to form, and the pseudo-Founder agrees, then the pseudo-Founder forms the Corporation by announcing the Corporation's name, its type, paying the standard Harfer's Fee, and announceing the name of its members. 120 shares in the Corporation are created and distributed equally among the initial members; excess shares are destroyed. > >The name must be a legal name. > >2. Corporation Disbandment > >The rules may call for the disbandment of an Corporation. > >When an Corporation is disbanded, everything owned by the Corporation is transferred to the Treasury, all shares associated with the Corporation are destroyed, and the Corporation is then no more. > >3. Corporate Voting > >When a motion is made to a Corporation, its stockholders have one week to vote publicly. At the end of that week or when sufficient votes have been made such that no additional votes could change the outcome, the result of the votes will be determined. If the motion was privaleged, the support of entities owning at least two-thirds of the shares is requrired for it to pass; otherwise the support of the owners of a simple majority is needed. Corporations which own shares in the Corporation and do not vote are not counted for the purposes of determining the number of shares neccessary, nor are shares buried in treasure. > >4. Motions > >Any shareholder may make a motion to a Corporation e owns shares in. The following are valid, non-privaleged, motions: > 1) To accept offered entities > 2) To change its name to a valid name (which costs the Corporation the SHF, and fails if it does not have an SHF) > 3) To make a motion to a partially-owned Corporation > 4) To vote on a motion in another Corporation. > >The following are valid privaleged motions: > 1) To accept a trade or offer entities > 2) To disband > 3) To mint and distribute new shares associated with the Corporation > 4) To operate a Secret Lab or other Corporate equipment. > >The maker of the motion is assumed to vote for the motion. > >5. Corruption > >A player may call a Corruption hearing against a Corporation claiming that the entity is abusing the rules. They then become the SEC Inspector (Hearing Harfer) for that hearing. The valid votes are "They're just honest business people, and besides, everyone does it" and "Split 'em up like Ma Bell!". If the result is the former the SEC Inspector must pay the SHF to each of the members or stock holders. If the result is the latter the entity is disbanded and the SEC Inspector receives a bribe, er, payment of twice the SHF from the Treasury. > >6. The Principle of Otzma > >Corporations have no real understanding of the power that lurks in cards. Therefore, if any Corporation owns an Otzma Card, that Otzma Card is destroyed. >NEWORGORDER > >Repeal rule 1004. >Renumber rule 1005 to 1050. > >Create rule 1005, "Shares" with the following STOCK-delimited text >STOCK > Shares are nameless, tradeable entities. Each share is associated with a Corporation. > If a Corporation owns a share associated with itself, that share is destroyed. > If a group of Corporations own shares in such a way that no entity other than a member of that group owns shares in any of those Corporations, all those Corporations are immediately disbanded. > If an entity owns two-thirds or more of the shares of a Corporation which are not buried, then all entities owned by that Corporation will be treated as if they are owned by that entity and the Corporation will be known as a Subsidiary; for the purposes of this paragraph, a player who owns n% of a Corporation is treated as owning n% of the shares that Corporation owns. This paragraph takes precedence over all other rules which transfer entities. >STOCK > >All societies are turned into Corporations with 120 shares split evenly among their members; any excess shares are destroyed. All entities owned by Political Parties are transfered to a random member of that Party. > >Renumber rule 1006 to 1055. >Repeal 1007. >Renumber 1007.1 to 1025, replace all occurances of "Organization" in it with "Political Party", and rename it "Political Party Admissions". >Renumber 1021, and amend it to read as delimited by NEWPOLITICS >NEWPOLITICS >A Political Party is a nameless, unownable entity. Being a member of more than one Political Party simultaneously is the Crime of Branch-Stacking. At the end of a proposal's voting period, but before votes on that proposal are counted, if every voting player member of a given Political Party voted YES on that proposal, and no member of the Party is also a member of some other Party, then the Political Party itself shall cast an additional YES vote on that proposal for every three voting player members it has. > >Party membership and how players voted are determined based on the facts in force at the end of the voting period for each proposal. > >Any player may publically announce eir intent to form a Political Party, unless e is a pseudo-Founder. > >When a player has done so e becomes a pseudo-Founder for a period of 7-days. > >If during those 7 days at least two additional players publically announce that they wish to join the Party the pseudo-Founder intends to form, and the pseudo-Founder agrees, then the pseudo-Founder forms the Party by announcing the Party's name, its type, paying A$300, and announcing the name of its members. >NEWPOLITICS > >Rename 1008 to "Corporate Powers" and replace every occurance of the word "Organization" in it with "Corporation". >Append to rule 1008 the text "A Subsidiary Corporation may not use Corporate Powers." >In rule 1011 and 1013, replace "Organizational" with "Corporate" and "Organization" with "Corporation". >Repeal rule 1015. >Replace the first two paragraphs of rule 1017 with the following TRUSTCASE-delimited text >TRUSTCASE >A Trust Fund is a type of corporation. When a player announces eir intent to found a Trust Fund, they must also annonuce a charter and a name. If the player can then afford to pay the SHF, the Fund comes into existance with the specified charter, without going throuhg the waiting period and without needing any other players to express interest. Trust Funds may only own tradeable entities. >TRUSTCASE >Replace "$A" in the rest of 1017 with "tradeable entities". >Replace the first sentence of the penultimate paragraph of rule 1017 with "A Trust Fund's charter should specify what is should do with its tradeable entites and when it should accept offered trades." > >Repeal rule 1020. >Create rule 1020, "Organization Miscellany" reading as delimited by ORGJUNK >ORGJUNK > A player may call a Tax Evasion hearing against a Church or Political Party, claiming that the entity is abusing the rules. They then become the IRS Investigator (Hearing Harfer) for that hearing. The valid votes are "You're just persecuting them because they donated to your opponent" and "Worse than United Way". If the result is the former the IRS Investigator must pay the SHF to each of the members or stock holders. If the result is the latter the entity is disbanded and the IRS Investigator receives a bribe, er, payment of twice the SHF from the Treasury. > Because Churches are religious, they eschew any pagan symbols. Therefore, if any Church owns an Otzma Card, that Otzma Card is destroyed. >ORGJUNK ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3873 Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 20:00:42 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3873 Merrily we fall along else...if Due: Sun Dec 13 20:00:41 1998 Amend rule 419, "Ambassador" to read as the following THISONCEWASTHELIAISON-delimited text THISONCEWASTHELIAISON The office of Ambassador is a political office. The Ambassador is the delegate^0 of Ackanomic to the InterNomic Treaty Organization^0 as defined in rule 419.1. The Ambassador must always be subscribed to the offical INTO-mailing-list^0. Any player may call an Agreement hearing on an InterNomic-Treaty^0 which Ackanomic has not signed or a Disagreement hearing on an InterNomic-Treaty^0 which Ackanomic has signed^0 and which allows Ackanomic to unsign^0 it. The Ambassador is the Hearing Harfer on both types of hearings. The valid responses to an Agreement hearing are "No! We want to mess up things for ourselves, without help from those black-helicopter flying INTO goons!" and "Surrender control to those black-helicopter flying INTO goons!". If the result is the latter than the Ambassador should sign^0 the treaty^0 the hearing was called on for Ackanomic. The valid responses to a Disagreement hearing are "What's your problem? Our rulers are doing a great job of pretending they still have power" and "Never mind prosperity for all, let's return to the dark ages". If the result is the latter the Ambassador should unsign^0 the treaty^0. The Ambassador may never sign^0 a treaty^0 which has terms which include hyphens or carets. Should the INTO Archivist^0 be a player of Ackanomic then that player receives a monthly A$25 stipend as a salary for bringing glory to Ackanomic. If a word or string of hyphenated words is followed by a caret and then a nonnegative integer: [^n] then the word is considered to be equivalent to the way that word or that word with the hyphens replaced by spaces is used in INT#n^0. No other terms or words used in the rules are considered to be the same as any terms defined in an InterNomic-Treaty^0. If n is 0 then it means the term is considered equivalent to a term defined in the INTO-rules^0. THISONCEWASTHELIAISON Create rule 419.1, "INTO Ruleset" with the following RULESANDREGULATIONS-delimited text RULESANDREGULATIONS Everything in this rule after this sentence is the ruleset of the InterNomic Treaty Organization Rule 1: The Archivist is responsible for tracking InterNomic Treaties. Rule 2: The Archivist selects the official mailing list, and must make a public notification of any changes to it. The first Archivist will be Uri Bruck (bruck@actcom.co.il) and the first mailing list will be internomic@muppetlabs.com. Rule 3: A notification is public if it is sent to everyone subscribed to the mailing list. Rule 4: A Nomic may designate a single delegate to the InterNomic Treaty Organization. Changes to the identity or the initial announcement of a delegate must be made by public notice. If there is an ambiguity about the identity of the delegate, the Archivist should determine the correct identity by inspecting the ruleset of that Nomic and other documents relating to that Nomic. If the rules and other documents for a Nomic are not available on the Web, then that Nomic must make them available to the Archivist in order have a delegate. Rule 5: The Archivist is elected. When there is no Archivist, Treaties may not be made or signed. If public notice is made that there is no Archivist, and no public notice is made by the Archivist contradicting this fact for one week, then nominations begin. A person nominates emself by making public notice of this. After one week of nominations, each Nomic, through its delegate, may vote for a candidate via public notice. Two weeks after the votes begin, the person who received the most votes becomes Archivist. If there is a tie, a runoff is held between tied people as if nominations had just ended and those two were the only nominees. Note that this ay require multiple runoffs. Rule 6: A person proposes a Treaty by making public notice of the content of the treaty. For two weeks after it is proposed, a Treaty is preliminary. After a Treaty has been preliminary for two weeks, it becomes an official InterNomic Treaty if it has been endorsed by at least three people, one of whom must be a delegate, including the player who proposed it (who is automatically assumed to endorse it). Otherwise it is destroyed. Endorsements may only be made by public notice. Rule 7: When a Treaty becomes an official InterNomic Treaty, the Archivist must assign it the smallest positive integer not already assigned to a Treaty and make its content available upon request (preferably be storing it on a web page). In any occurances of the string "INT#n" in that Treaty, the "n" is replaced by the number of the Treaty. Rule 8: Any Nomic, through its delegate, may sign an InterNomic Treaty by making public notice of this. The signing succeeds if and only if the Nomic has met all prerequisites within the Treaty for signing it. The Archivist should track which Nomics have signed a Treaty along with the content of the Treaty. A Nomic may remove its signature from an InterNomic Treaty unless the Treaty puts restrictions on doing so, in which case the Nomic must meet those restrictions before doing so. Rule 9: Although Nomics are expected to abide by an honor code, and obey the treaties they have signed, there is no general enforcement method in existance. Treaties should include enforcement when it is neccessary. RULESANDREGULATIONS ------------------------------ From: devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu Subject: Acka: Proposal 3841 rejected Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 21:47:54 -0500 (EST) Proposal 3841 Votes: 15/23 (6 YES votes): Quorum met Yes votes: 6/17: proposal rejected Tammany Bribes: ThinMan A$50 no Yes: Robin Hood (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) smallpox blanket (Klingon) else...if Vynd Studge (Giant Objectionable Potato) MTM (The Razor Boomerangs) No: Alfvaen (MetaMorph) Trent (Giant Objectionable Potato) Euphrates **** Bonus Vote (ThinMan) **** /dev/joe (Vulcan) Jenny (The Razor Boomerangs) **** Bonus Vote (/dev/joe) **** ThinMan (Vulcan) Tammany sIRE JT (The Razor Boomerangs) Baa: Slakko (SPAM) Abstain r-attila the farce (Giant Objectionable Potato) IdiotBoy (Anti-Voting Preservationist Party) Niccolo Flychuck (MetaMorph) K 2 Calvin N Hobbes rufus Wild Card two-star Pending & did not vote: Danek scout Ballot Stuffer Vacationing & did not vote: Aunt Froot Ethelred J. M. Bear (MetaMorph) saaremaa (Vulcan) >Subject: Acka: Proposal 3841 > >Proposal 3841 >No more bridges >else...if >Due: Sun Dec 6 21:09:19 1998 > > This is a Modest proposal. > [I don't think Slakko's fix will work well, and regardless it will >be too late for it to be as fun as possible.] > Repeal rule 810.1 ------------------------------ End of acka-voting Digest V3 #219 *********************************