acka-research Digest Friday, April 02 1999 Volume: 04 Issue: 065 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tom Walmsley Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 4141 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 18:44:47 -0500 (EST) ackabot@ackanomic.org wrote: > > Proposal 4141 > Tinkering with Literature > K 2 > Due: Fri Apr 9 19:32:03 1999 You know, I thought literature had been repealed. I guess not. One thing I do recall for certain though is that a proposal I authored removing everyone but TMBG from the lit list passed so the version on the website is very out of date. Laa Laa. -- Tom "Garbed in Gingham" Walmsley. AIM: TGW666 ICQ: 2925739 http://website.lineone.net/~t.walmsley/index.html "One of the advantages of horses that people often point out is that they very seldom explode." Jingo - Terry Pratchett. ------------------------------ From: Matt Miller Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 4130 accepted Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 21:26:59 -0500 (EST) On Fri, 2 Apr 1999 ackabot@ackanomic.org wrote: > Proposal 4130 > Substantially Safer Proposals > else...if > Due: Fri Apr 2 19:02:52 1999 > Status: accepted > > If two proposals currently in the proposal queue would have identical > effects on the game state if passed, or a CFJ finds them to be > substantially similar, then the later of the two to be submitted shall be > deemed invalid and removed from voting consideration. > Contary t what I believed to be the intended purpose. I blieve this created a new rule numbered 99-1. Abusing my standing as ruleharfer I have renumbered it to 2-1-3-1 for safe keeping. IB ------------------------------ End of acka-research Digest V4 #65 **********************************