acka-research Digest Wednesday, December 16 1998 Volume 03 : Issue 298 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Uri Bruck Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 3917 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:36:28 -0500 (EST) This is a good proposal! It extends the framework in a coherent way and is a legitimate successor to the original Vision of the Organizational structure. I say 'Aye'. Niccolo Flychuck On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Towsner wrote: > >Wow. 3917 is a major proposal. I am intrigued by some of the details, and > >I like the new concepts of operability and intelligence. On the Org side, > >it looks mainly like Organizations become Institutions and Membership > >Organizations become Organizations -- in that respect, no real change > >except the names [all assuming that P3902 will pass]. I agree, however, > >that 3917 will clean up some things in the Org setup that 3902 may leave > >a little rough around the edges. It has my endorsement. [Now all you > >Ackans who rely upon my opinion can go vote for it. :-) ] > I should note that the only functional change for Orgs is that > Trust Funds become a separate type of Institution (not a type of > Corporation), and require two co-founders. > I'm glad that we two have finally reached an agreement on how > Orgs/Corps, now Insts should work. I just hope the other 13 players agree > with us:) [You even use brackets as comments in discussion?] > > -- > -Henry Towsner > > > > Thank heavens, the sun has gone in, and I don't have to go out and > enjoy it. > -Logan Pearsall Smith > > > > > ------------------------------ > ------------------------------ From: K 2 Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 3917 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:36:03 -0500 (EST) devjoe@wilma.che.utexas.edu wrote: > Proposal 3917 > Re-entity > else...if > Due: Tue Dec 22 19:20:38 1998 ... > Amend rule 515 to read as delimited by R515 > R515 > ... > A Player may retract a trade he or she offered by sending a public > message to that effect. > R515 > ... Why a player and not a Trading entity rather than 'a player'? > ... > Replace all occurances of "Organizational Power" in the rules with > "Institutional Power" Bad Form? Dangerous certainly... or maybe not in this case. > ... K 2 ------------------------------ End of acka-research Digest V3 #298 ***********************************