From: owner-acka-research@wilma.che.utexas.edu (Ackanomic Research Digest) To: acka-research-digest Subject: Ackanomic Research Digest V2 #102 Reply-To: acka-research@wilma.che.utexas.edu Sender: owner-acka-research@wilma.che.utexas.edu Errors-To: owner-acka-research@wilma.che.utexas.edu Precedence: bulk Ackanomic Research Digest Wednesday, July 2 1997 Volume 02 : Number 102 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 17:58:59 -0400 From: Malenkai Subject: Re: Acka: Proposal 2198 > Proposal 2198 > Thargoid Weapon Dealer Crackdown > Amend Rule 2104, "More Blatant Elitism", by removing the text "the > replacement of any Military lasers in the player's possession by Pulse > lasers, and" Why didn't you just repeal the rule? Without the laser business, the rule has no fun value at all, IMHO. Also, I seem to remember it being repealed already, but I am probably wrong. Malenkai ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 22:36:18 -0400 (EDT) From: John Frederic Mc Coy Subject: Re: Acka: P2163 rejected (Less Paper Work = More Fun (part 2)) On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Acrobot wrote: > Proposal 2163 > Less Paper Work = More Fun (part 2) > Calvin N Hobbes > > Votes cast by active players: 14 / 20 = 70.000000% > Yes: 4 No: 3 Present: 8 ...Proposal rejected. > Heh. has the total number of YES and NO votes on a proposal ever been less than the number of present votes before? I seem to remember a Party Chess proposal that might ahve qualified some time back, but this is a lot weirder... - Vynd jmccoy@umich.edu ------------------------------ End of Ackanomic Research Digest V2 #102 ****************************************