From: owner-acka-games@wilma.che.utexas.edu (Ackanomic Games Digest) To: acka-games-digest Subject: Ackanomic Games Digest V2 #55 Reply-To: acka-games@wilma.che.utexas.edu Sender: owner-acka-games@wilma.che.utexas.edu Errors-To: owner-acka-games@wilma.che.utexas.edu Precedence: bulk Ackanomic Games Digest Wednesday, April 30 1997 Volume 02 : Number 055 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 08:17:14 -0500 From: "Bollinger, John C." Subject: RE: Acka: Fictionary > One thing to discuss: ThinMan consistently did not capitalize his > definition, or, in this case, the proper nouns in his definition. I > capitalized them for him, but was unconfortable performing any edits > on the submitted definitions. I believe I noticed that another > Brainiac > did *not* do this capitalization, and thus allowed an easy rule out. > Most Brainiacs appeared to have done the capitalization (or all > definitions submitted to them were capitalized). The question is, how > *should* we do it? Edits or no edits? I would prefer none, but most > of all, would prefer consistency. Any comments? > When I was Brainiac, I tried to be sure to do any minor editing required to present the definitions in a uniform format. I think that this is appropriate. In the version if this game that is played in person, I am used to the "Brainiac" _reading_ all the definitions, thus obscuring any differences in formatting. ThinMan ------------------------------ End of Ackanomic Games Digest V2 #55 ************************************